These answers cover the exam, the shot, and recovery

Sources

1. A network meta-analysis of 11 RCTs (1,353 patients) with HIP osteoarthritis found that at 2-4 and 6 months NO intervention - corticosteroid, hyaluronic acid or PRP - significantly outperformed intra-articular saline placebo for either pain or function, while all interventions including placebo produced improvement exceeding the minimal clinically important difference from baseline. Evidence from the knee does not transfer to the hip.

   Gazendam A, et al. — Intra-articular saline injection is as effective as corticosteroids, platelet-rich plasma and hyaluronic acid for hip osteoarthritis pain: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 2021. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102179.

2. A meta-analysis of 11 RCTs (730 patients) with lateral epicondylitis found the timing reverses the answer: corticosteroid was significantly BETTER than PRP in the short term (under 2 months: VAS mean difference 0.93 favouring steroid; DASH 10.23 favouring steroid), the two did not differ at 2-6 months, and PRP was significantly better at 6 months or more (VAS -2.18; DASH -8.13; Mayo Elbow +16.53).

   Xu Y, et al. — Platelet-Rich Plasma Has Better Results for Long-term Functional Improvement and Pain Relief for Lateral Epicondylitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2024. DOI: 10.1177/03635465231213087.

3. A meta-analysis of 27 RCTs (1,779 patients) across rotator cuff injury, lateral epicondylitis, plantar fasciitis and tenosynovitis found no PRP advantage at one month anywhere, and in some tendons corticosteroid was better early; PRP overtook corticosteroid at 3 months for rotator cuff VAS and at 6 months for plantar fasciitis VAS and AOFAS and for tenosynovitis VAS.

   Ye Z, et al. — Platelet-rich plasma and corticosteroid injection for tendinopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2025. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-025-08566-3.

4. The largest head-to-head trial of cell-based orthobiologics to date randomised 480 patients with KL II-IV knee OA across four arms: autologous bone marrow aspirate concentrate, autologous adipose stromal vascular fraction, allogeneic umbilical cord tissue-derived MSCs, and a corticosteroid injection control. At 12 months NONE of the three orthobiologic injections was superior to another or to the corticosteroid control on either co-primary endpoint (VAS pain, KOOS pain), and none of the four groups showed a significant change in MRI osteoarthritis score from baseline. No procedure-related serious adverse events were reported.

   Mautner K, et al. — Cell-based versus corticosteroid injections for knee pain in osteoarthritis: a randomized phase 3 trial.. Nature Medicine, 2023. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-023-02632-w.

5. Medicare's national coverage determination states that CMS covers autologous platelet-rich plasma ONLY for patients with chronic non-healing diabetic, pressure and/or venous wounds, and only inside an approved coverage-with-evidence-development clinical study. Every approved study listed under the NCD is a wound-healing study. There is no Medicare national coverage for PRP in osteoarthritis or tendinopathy, which is why these injections are billed to the patient.

   Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — Autologous Platelet-rich Plasma (Coverage with Evidence Development). CMS.gov, 2024.

6. FDA states verbatim of stem cell products, stromal vascular fraction (adipose-derived cells), umbilical cord blood, Wharton's jelly, amniotic fluid and exosome products: 'None of these products have been approved for the treatment of any orthopedic condition, such as osteoarthritis, tendonitis, disc disease, tennis elbow, back pain, hip pain, knee pain, neck pain, or shoulder pain.' The only FDA-approved stem cell products in the United States are blood-forming (hematopoietic progenitor) cells derived from umbilical cord blood, approved only for disorders of blood production, and there are currently NO FDA-approved exosome products.

   U.S. Food and Drug Administration — Consumer Alert on Regenerative Medicine Products Including Stem Cells and Exosomes. FDA (Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research), 2020.

7. The 2025 Cochrane review of stem cell injections for knee osteoarthritis pooled 25 randomised trials (1,341 participants) and found that, compared with placebo injection, stem cell injection MAY slightly improve pain (1.2 points better on a 0-10 scale, 7 studies, 445 participants) and function (14.2 points better on a 0-100 scale, 7 studies, 432 participants) up to six months - both rated LOW-certainty evidence, downgraded for indirectness (cell source, preparation and dose varied across studies) and suspected publication bias, since up to three larger RCTs were conducted and withdrawn before reporting results. Radiographic progression was not assessed in any included study.

   Whittle SL, et al. — Stem cell injections for osteoarthritis of the knee.. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2025. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013342.pub2.